Friday, April 9, 2010

The N.L. East

The N.L. East

Here’s where I really start caring. Why? The Mets. That’s why. The fucking Mets. Ah the Mets. They are the reason I’m writing any of this really. I don’t care enough about the other 29 teams. Perhaps I would adopt another team were the boys from Queens not around, but perhaps not. I am not here to deal in hypotheticals, not that one anyway. Instead, let’s take a brief tour of this team as I have known them.

Growing up, my father was a Brooklyn Dodgers fan. He grew up in Connecticut, and it was probably between them and the Yankees. The Red Sox were a little too distant. According to the top historian on my staff Buck 65, the Dodgers moved West in 1957 and were replaced by the Mets in the 1962 expansion.

In 1981, at 3:30 in the afternoon on the 17th of November, I was born in Manhattan. The Mets second and most recent World Series championship was just less than 5 years later in 1986. I know much about it now, but I don’t have any firsthand memories I can claim as my own. Perhaps in the buried recesses of my memory there are leaps of elation as the ball trickles through Bill Buckner’s legs as if he was so stunned by history happening that he caused it to happen, Mookie comes into score, Jesse Orosco records the final out…

I remember the great-but-should-have-been-better Mets of 1988. I remember the front page of the New York Times when Bobby Bonilla signed an ostentatious and before long disastrous contract. The early 90s Mets slogged through those years with the unforgiving slowness of a real New York summer. I don’t know if New York gets those summers anymore. I don’t know that they don’t- my last full summer there was in 2004. I just remember there were times that the heat would pour down from above and burn up out of the concrete, and if it didn’t make you so slow, you might imagine yourself slapping away fireballs with a ping-pong racquet.

After a few years of what could only be charitably called mediocrity, hope sprung eternal when the Mets developed three stunning young pitchers- Pulsipher, Isringhausen and Wilson to go along with all star pitcher Bobby Jones. Things were looking up. Isringhausen eventually had success as a closer in Oakland and St. Louis where they called him Izzy-gonna-blow-it? His career was by far the most successful of the three. Wilson seemed to constantly be recovering from surgery, had some scattered moments of promise in Cincinnati, and that was it. Pulse, my favorite, after his stunning debut with the Mets, battled injuries off and on, and never really got a major league career up and running. The team would have to wait until the late 90s to be a force again.

It is easily forgotten, especially with the other New York team enjoying one of the greatest stretches of dominance seen in the history of the game, but the late 90s-early 0s Mets were formidable. You didn’t want to mess with Fonzie-Olerud-Piazza. You didn’t want to hit a ball near Rey Ordonez. You usually couldn’t do much against Leiter’s cut fastball. My favorite ever baseball memory is this:

The other team is at bat. No, I don’t remember who they were. All I remember is a sharp groundball, up the middle, just to the right of second base. Looks like a single. Alfonzo darts toward it and stabs it with his glove, all his momentum sending him toward left-field. Freeze the picture there and it seems that he has made a nice play, that will simply mean that this is an infield single, as opposed to one that will be picked up by the center fielder. He is several steps behind second base and running in the wrong direction. He could try to stop and throw, or the Jeter jump-throw (this was before he patented it). Neither of those was likely to work, and it probably made as much sense as anything to just hold on to the ball. Instead, Fonzie did something I had never seen before or since. Without a moment’s hesitation, he flipped it to Rey Ordonez out of his glove. Ordonez was also behind second, running the opposite direction as if he had somehow foreseen this whole thing. He caught the pass barehand and fired to first in one motion. They got the runner by a step and a half. It was breathtaking. Most of the Mets teams I’ve seen in my day- if that happened it would seem like a bizarre fluke- incredible but mostly unintentional. People would find ways to make fun of them for pulling off something like that when the basics of the game sometimes seemed lost on them. Those Mets though, they had a swagger. They expected to win if the opponent was not the Yankees or Braves, and occasionally against them as well. Those moments were magical, but all the more so because they were within the reach of that team. They really were good.

The Mets of 2010 are, like, so many Mets teams before them, trying to disprove history, not continue it. The stunning failures of 2007 and 2008 were followed with a yearlong malaise in 2009. The entire rotation had a forgettable year. Reyes went down, Beltran went down, Delgado went down. Murphy didn’t hit how we’d hoped. The baseball gods could not fell David Wright by conventional means, so he got hit in the head with a pitch. To my knowledge, two Mets had seasons they can look back on fondly. One is Jeff Francouer. The not so long ago future of the Braves brought them frustration, outs and not much else. They swapped him for Ryan Church, who they released at the end of the season. It was addition by subtraction more than anything else. As a Met, Francouer was really good. It was only 2 months or so, but heads were turned and then scratched. He is to be the Mets starting right fielder this year. Let’s do the guy a favor and not really expect anything in particular out of this. The other Met who had a good year was Luis Castillo. He got on base a lot and still has decent speed. The Mets spent all winter trying to trade him. They found no takers. Anything like last year’s production would be fantastic.

There was one other Met who produced favorable noises. That was Josh Thole. There’s a good chance that he’s the next Daniel Murphy- a guy who you haven’t heard of, plays well once rosters are expanded, makes you ponder the next year and beyond, and it turns out there was a reason you hadn’t heard of him before. Still, Thole brings up one of the more bewildering offseasons the Mets have had in a while.

Josh Thole may not amount to much in terms of wins, but he’s someone for fans to be happy enough about. At worst he’s a fun backup who you can dream on a little. And he’s cheap, and will be for a while. What’s not to like. With Thole already in the fold, the Mets went out and signed catchers as if their value was cumulative. They signed three catchers. None of them hit much. Rod Barajas hits a little more than the others, and he’ll be the starter. Henry Blanco can throw out runners like no other and he’ll be the backup. Chris Coste will walk around with a puzzle piece in his hand to symbolize that he may have made sense to a team looking to contend who was in need of a backup catcher. I hope the Mets contend, but the only thing they definitely don’t need is a backup catcher.

As for the other positions, Wright, I think will bounce back from his bizarro power outage, Bay should whack home runs and move slowly, Reyes thankfully seems to have a normal hamstring and thyroid, so, y’know, that’s good, Beltran is our $18M secret weapon, Francouer is eliciting some nice spring training-esque praise, Murphy should be serviceable at first and Castillo may just “earn” his salary again.

I doubt there is more potential swing in any rotation in baseball. Last year existed almost entirely on the crappy end of the swing. There isn’t much to say here that hasn’t already been said. I watch the middle three- Pelfrey, Maine, Perez- with the concern usually reserved for trying to figure out if a friend or relative is just a little sick or really sick. The jumble of impressive-for-a-fifth starter fifth starters are impressive, but I don’t know how much I trust them the second and third times through the order.

What happens: Perfection, beauty, indescribable goodness. Perez finds a fastball-curveball thing that makes heads spin. Pelfrey fucks you up. Maine figures out how to be a crafty snapper with neat stuff. Nelson Figueroa sings opera solos. Francouer is dangerous in the 6-spot. Beltran plays many games and does what he can do. Reyes finds that magic balance between baseball and dancing.

That’s right, I’m picking the Mets to win the division. Deal with it.

2. The Philadelphia Phillies

So, these guys are good. Utley’s a beast, Howard’s a monster, Werth is worth it, Rollins will roll you, and because of their presence, Ibanez and Polanco can be nifty complimentary players. They also have the Flyin Hawaiian and someone who plays catcher. Sure they’re good.

Then there’s the rotation. Halladay is really really good. Hamels is very good and the rest of them will elicit few complaints as long as the first two do their jobs.

But what I really want to talk about is The Trade. Quick recap: the Phillies had Cliff Lee, an ace under contract for one more year who seemed to want to test the open market after this season. The Blue Jays had Halladay, even better than Lee, who was definitely gone after this year, and there was no way they were going to contend. On the same day, the Phillies acquired Halladay for some of their best prospects and traded Lee for some good but not quite as good prospects. They then extended Halladay for the next three years. The team improved, and they swapped an ace who would likely leave for one who will stick around. Not bad.

Still, so many have looked at what they got for Lee and wondered if that deal was worth it. What if they had just accepted a crappy farm system and gone Halladay-Lee-Hamels…. I think GM Ruben Amaro saw it like this. He had three options.

1) Make the Halladay trade and see what he can get for Lee or Blanton later. I think this was rejected because if you let fans fall in love with that rotation, they will be heartbroken when you break it up. I’m generally on the side of good decisions over the feelings of the mob, but this one I understand.

2) Do it all in one fell swoop. This is what he did. The problem is that by attaching the timetable of the Halladay deal to that of the Lee deal, you don’t have much time to let a market develop and find the right trade. Maybe Blanton gets you part of that haul.

3) Keep Halladay and Lee, trade Blanton if you can. Here’s my little pet theory. Amaro had pulled off the Lee trade- an ace for some good prospects- at the last deadline, and here he was about to do it again… and he kind of just freaked out. Looking at that lineup with that rotation- something just felt wrong. That and his farm system would be barren, his payroll overloaded- no we must take steps to reduce payroll and restock the farm. An ace for an ace. Prospects for prospects. We’re still improving the team.

Fair enough, but think about the alternative. First his team would be by far the most likely of any other to reach the World Series. They would be one of the four best teams in baseball and the other three play in the A.L. East. Second, if and when Lee walks away, they get two draft picks in a stacked draft (from what I hear- I know next to nothing about undrafted prospects). Finally, they are probably doing fine money-wise, but I think that rotation is worth some extra patronage, not to mention the increased chance of advancing in the playoffs which is lots of extra $$$. Lastly, I bet someone takes Blanton off their hands to at least bring the payroll back to where they want it.

Still these guys are good. I’ll give ‘em the Wild Card.

3. The Atlanta Braves

I wouldn’t be shocked at all to see another prolonged ascension from these guys. Not sure what to make of the Vasquez trade. Thought it was kind of dumb at the time. Everyone love Jason Heyward. Chipper is still Chipper, but he needs to be more of a complimentary player now. He’ll carry the team one more time for Bobby, but then it’ll be time for others to shoulder the load. They have good pitching too.

4. Fish!

These guys are always good. At the same time, they’re usually bad. Fear the fish.

5. The Washington Nationals

I’m still not sold on their name. Like a fine cuisine, it takes time to develop a real baseball team, but these guys seem to be some version of on their way. I fear Strasburg.

Thursday, April 8, 2010

The N.L. West

1. The Rockies

It's time for all good cows to come to the aid of their pasture. It was a Tuesday and everyone was one day deader than they were on Monday. Isn't it over when the bat turns back into a person? Wait, were they vampires all along? Bring me the head of whoever said play fair. Rogue state, rogue house, rogue the x-man, by which I mean the x-lady.

2. The Dodgers

They are good, and yet, nope. The problem is L.A. That city is a problem. Anything that stays there long enough is likely to reflect the problem. That's why the Dodgers won't win the division this year.

3. Snakes on a plane!

These guys spin and slither. They will bite you. Isn't it weird how some teams are vastly better than others, but it is extremely rare for someone to be outside the 40-60% range of wins and losses. No one really approaches an outsider's idea of dominance. Snakes!

4. The Giants

Unfortunately, size only helps you so much in baseball, and then, after that point, it starts making it more difficult. Even the largest bats allowed are so small as to be unwieldy in your fingers. While you need few steps to get between bases, your bulk makes you lumber. You are very easy to tag. Gotta love the Freak though. I mean that guy is just awesome. And small. I've heard he looks 14 with his shirt off. I've heard that Pablo Sandoval is actually a panda, but it's just a rumor.

5. The Padres

While they're not that good, they can still be the Ringo Starr of this band. If the Beatles were the N.L. West, the Padres would be Ringo, the Dodgers Paul, the Rockies John, the Diamondbacks George and the Giants would be Billy Shears. Bud Selig would be Yoko Ono, the Cardinals would be Mick Jagger, the Brewers Keith Richards and the Rays would be the Velvet Underground. The thing is, I doubt that this era of baseball can live up to that era of music because most things don't.

The N.L. Central 2010

The N.L. Central

What is it about the Centrals? They are not places of fear. Their non-coasts are defined by mediocrity and uncertainty. This Central has a team that stands alone. The other does not. Still, the Central weaves good stories. It's tales aren't blown out by the ocean or swallowed by the heat of an overgrown metropolis.

1. The St. Louis Cardinals

Probably the most obvious pick in the whole shebang. They are not the best, but they are the most better. That's all. I like Pujols because he is magic without being magical. Pedro was magical. Big Papi, back when he was younger and on steroids was magical. Pujols- I think Pujols is just that good. He just outworks you and he's better.

2. The Milwaukee Brewers

I take back some of what I said before about the Central's mediocrity. I was a different man then. I failed to see the rising star in Cincinnati, the still decent roster in Chicago, the interesting tire stores of Pittsburgh and Houston. But mostly I forgot that the Brewers are still a nifty squad. I suppose they lack pitching, but where's your pitching? I mean seriously, where is it?

3. Here's where I really get to say "Ummm..." There are still four teams to rank and none of them are exactly jumping at me for the honor of third on this worst grouping of the world's very best baseball players. The way I see it, there are two groups of two. The Cs and then the pH. For this group I will reward direction by picking the

Cincinnati Reds.

I associate this team with heat. This is probably wrong. I don't know what the climate is like in Southern Ohio, but based on my four years in Northern Ohio, I'm not ready to declare it a place of heat the way much of the South is. The other thing I associate the Reds with is mediocrity. I think the last time I remember them being good was when I was in high school. It's very possible they snuck in a couple of good years when I wasn't looking- surely there best year of Griffey-Dunn wasn't so bad- but nothing worth more than a "pheh" has happened with this team recently, so part of me extrapolates that and figures that this is more or less the way it is. Now people are saying this team could be good very soon. Probably not this year soon, but perhaps the next one. I want to write anxious things about Dusty Baker and young pitchers, but it just wouldn't accomplish very much.

4. The Chicago Cubes

I lived in Chicago for three and a half years, ending this past August. In the many Cubs fans, I saw a little of the Mets fans I identify with. Being a fan of either one of these teams is more than anything about dashed hopes. Neither is consistently bad, and they will sometimes be quite good. They will keep you thinking that with a few breaks and a nifty second baseman, magic could happen. In the end the story is about the wrong-headedness of the higher-ups and the defeat of the lower downs.

Now I'm going to be a snooty East Coaster and say that the Mets breed seems to me more academic about this general state. Cubs fans are like sophomores who are still full of hope, still charged with orange energy. They will make jokes about their team's century-long championship drought, but behind it all there is something puppy-like. All teams have that to some degree, but Mets fans seem to have the awareness that they are merely the chorus in a Greek tragedy, and Greek tragedies only end one way. Still, I dream...

5. The Houston Astros

This team may slowly be getting smarter. It might be too slow, and... wait, they signed Brandon Lyon to, what was it 3 years $15M? See I was just getting swept up in this whole the Central is not that bad thing, and then I remember that. Here are words that sound bolder than they are: The Astros will never make the playoffs with Carlos Lee on the roster.
That leaves

6. The Pittsburgh Pirates

This team was very successful, or at least very good in some of my most formative years. Back when they had Bonds v.1, Van Slyke and the rest of the gang. Perhaps for that reason I expect them to rise one day. It's kind of like how my dad likes to say "Watch out for catchers." I like to think "The Pirates will be good one of these days." It's not based on a lot, and now I have come to realize that I am merely taking the notion that given enough time, any franchise will eventually be able to put together a very good team, and giving is slightly more weight when it comes to the Pirates.

Sunday, March 7, 2010

Baseball! 2010!

It's here people! Didn't you know that every year I predict the baseball season? It's as true as whales. There are but a few rules: 1. The Mets Win. 2. Baseball is cosmically meaningless, miniaturely meaningful, meaningfully cosmic, meaninglessly miniature, comically full of seems (at least it seems that way), seemingly meaningful, meaninglessly cosmic. 3. There Are No Rules.

The A.L. Fucking East.

Don't you see what's happening people? They are accruing all the power! They are only pretending to fight each other, when really they build in strength until they will unite and crush the other divisions. The only hope to stop them is in the defector: Toronto. We can only assume that this has to do with them being in Canada. Stay in St. Louis Albert. Stay there or cross the border. Honestly, I'm sticking to Rule 1, but right now, I'm not sure the Mets deserve you.

1. The Yankees

I am, all of a sudden, as if awaking from a dream, upon which, nothing that was previously obvious still is, I find myself surprised that the Yankees are the best team in baseball. The Red Sox and Rays seemed to have outsmarted them, and an acidic element that seemed to erode their invincibility over time. Even the team that spends about three times the league average and 50% more than the next highest, even they cannot lock time into the late 90s.

It was odd how much talk there was of them "deserving" their World Series win. Tonya Harding doesn't deserve to win. The Yankees played baseball than anyone else. Thus, I am comfortable anointing them best team of 2009. This seems simple enough. It is also simple enough that the front office paid a lot of money in support of this, and that they dished out well over $400 million dollars in contracts the previous winter. Would a world in which C.C. Sabathia, charming and talented as he is, does not make $18 million dollars every year (or however much- if I don't look it up, it's because it doesn't matter), along with certain other changes, like drinkable water made accessible to the developing world, would that world be better? Or is there any greater-scheme connection between A-Rod's salary and those paid to teachers? That's where things get more complicated. I guess I don't care whether the Yankees deserved to win. Baseball is miniaturely meaningful. Deserve doesn't much enter the picture for me.

As for the games they will play, their rotation and lineup are both solid and loaded. Granderson might get a new jolt and give them a whole new deal at the top of their lineup. Jeter, Tex, A-Rod... these men are good at Whackstick. As if out of thin air they acquired Javy Vasquez. Their rotation is many things, but I can't imagine it won't be really good (by the way, in actual use, double negatives often don't mean exactly the same of the positive version of the statement.

I like Mariano Rivera because he is the only pitcher who basically just throws one pitch, and you can't confidently claim that he will age at anything like a normal rate until it happens.

2. The Rays

More gut than anything. That, and they are probably the second or third best team in the league. I mean this is the psycho division after all. I think Joe Maddon has another year's worth of doing his magic dance, and since they went berserko two years ago, they've always seemed to have an ambrosia flow of talent. Several scouts have used those exact words.

The Red Sox

These men wear red socks, and they are expected to be nifty at hitting, tremendous at defense, and monsters of the mound. Them winning the division seems as likely as any other outcome, and yet here they are in my predictions. I guess I'm loosely skeptical of this "new emphasis on defense." Yes the Mariners are charming, and my favorite play that I've ever seen in any sport is- well maybe you'll hear about it when I get to the Mets, but it's a defensive play. I just don't think it's the ticket to winning that recognizing on-base percentage for what it is was. Beltre is great, but I'm not saying DANG the Sox got BELTRE. I love Scutaro, but, I mean it's Scutaro. I actually love how this team is constructed. Awesome pitching, everyone capable with the glove and the bat, sneaky speed... it's just that I feel I described the Santana-Liriano Twins team, and that team would probably not have won this A.L. East.

But these Red Sox might. I believe these are the three best teams in baseball, with none of them significantly above any other. The Phillies could have been on that list, but we'll get to them.

4. The Orioles

There is a place called Baltimore.

It's... see once I... I've the bars are... the Wire took place in... there's this museum...

Adam Jones, Nick Markakis. I hear they're good. Other people too. Like Wieters. That's all I have to say about the Orioles.

5. The Blue Jays

It will be nice when this team can talk about the playoffs again. I don't know when that will be. No one does. It might be soon. It might be a decade or more. I have a reasonable amount of faith in the folks who run that team, whoever they are, but their division is a jungle. The Yankees aren't even crazy old any more. I feel like I could basically run the Mets. I don't know if I could run the Blue Jays.

The A.L. Central

Why do they call it the Central? Detroit, Cleveland, Chicago, Minnesota, Kansas City... these cities are in the Midwest. I've never called that area the "central" part of the United States, and I rarely refer to a region by its time-zone.

This is a division where I feel like there are teams that are good at winning and others that are good at losing. The Twins are somehow always better than you think they are, the Royals are pioneers of badness, the Indians ping-pong between these two and the other two do their best and hope it's good enough.


1. The Twins

Sometimes I wonder, but they are always better than you think they are. They will win baseball games.

2. The White Sox

Yeah, I dunno. Their lineup is less convincing than [insert something really unconvincing]. They can pitch enough to take second I suppose. I would catch the occasional Sox game on TV in Chicago. That Hawk guy is pretty unbearable. Give me Keith Hernandez criticizing the first baseman's footwork.

3. Hrmmm... let's go with the Tigers

These guys might actually be better than the White Sox. The thing is, they are also worse. It will depend on the day. It always depends on the day.

4. The Indians

I want them to win, but they won't win shit until they change that stupid logo. Listen here Cleveland people. I will buy a piece of Cleveland Spiders merchandise. That's $20 you can't have now, but will have on that condition. I bet I'm not the only one. Do it. I'm sick of this bullshit.

5. The Royals

Joe Posnanski, Bill James, Rob Neyer, Rany Jazayerli... these are some of the finest names in baseball writing. All are associated with the Royals. JoePo is pretty much the only reason I can name a non-Greinke Royal. Also the only reason I care about their fortunes. I wouldn't be shocked at all if there was something about Kansas City, be it the water, the light, the energy, the attitude... something that produces brilliant writing and crappy baseball.

The A.L. West

Whooooosh. The west wind blows. Sail until you reach land. Then keep a friendly demeanor and a hand half a moment from your cutlass. Whoooooosh.

1. I want to put the Mariners in. They have the best 1-2 pitching punch... awesome D... sneachy Ichiro... everyone loves Fig Newmans...
Screw it, the La La Angels

It'll be tighter this year, but I'll give it to them until they give it away. They are still good, and Scocia is probably the best manager in the division. Maybe in the A.L. Godzilla's not dead either.

2. The Mariners

Even for this I hesitate, because the Rangers are good too. Still... Fig Newmans...

3. The Rangers

Blardy blar sning bang woop patowza. That's all I got.

4. The athletic gentlemen from the land of the oaks.

Bill Beane, ever intriguing. One of these days we will wake up and the A's will be shockingly good. Don't expect this day to come before 2013. Maybe he's just in it for the long count.